OAuth 1.0 is the predecessor to OAuth2. Both specifications differ in terms of complexity, security and implementation.
OAuth 1.0 requires the use of cryptographic signatures to verify requests, which makes it secure but also complex to implement. OAuth2, on the other hand, is designed to be more user-friendly. It uses tokens instead of signatures to simplify the process.
OAuth 1.0 relies on a client secret and the signing of each request, which again, makes it secure but also complex. OAuth2 introduces the concept of bearer tokens, which are simpler to use, but can also pose potential security risks if not handled properly. While OAuth2 still uses client secrets for initial authentication, the bearer token can be passed along to the API from the client application with each subsequent request. As long as the token is still valid the client does not need to reauthenticate.
Lastly, OAuth2 is much more flexible than OAuth 1.0. It allows for different types of authorization flows (like the Authorization Code Grant, Implicit Grant, etc.) depending on the needs of the application.
Feature
OAuth 1.0
OAuth 2.0
Verification Method
Cryptographic signatures
Tokens
Security vs. Complexity
Secure but complex
Simpler, but potential security risks
Client Secret Requirement
Yes
Optional
Authorization Flows
Limited
Flexible (Authorization Code, Implicit, etc.)
Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of OAuth2:
OAuth2 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) are often mentioned together, but they are used in different contexts.
As we already know, OAuth2 is an authorization protocol that focuses on granting access to protected resources. OpenID Connect builds on top of OAuth2 and adds an authentication layer. It verifies the user’s identity by using an ID token, which contains information about the user, such as their name and email address.